Abaigeal Heneghan (CAS 2022), Presidential Scholar pursuing Honors in French; research supported by the Dean’s Undergraduate Research Fund
Changing Reception of Molière’s Tartuffe from Louis XIV to the French Revolution
In my thesis, I intend to analyze Molière’s Tartuffe in order to answer the following question: Was the arrest of Tartuffe at the end of the play legally justifiable under 17th- and 18th-century law and to what extent did it matter to the audience? Scholars of Molière have studied Tartuffe at great length and what makes it such an interesting subject is the controversy in which the play was embroiled from it’s very first appearance. The first version of Tartuffe was performed in 1664 and it was almost immediately censored and banned, for its perceived negative depiction of devotion.
Over a century later, during the French Revolution, Tartuffe was subjected to a round of editing by revolutionaries seeking to remove the influence of the Old Regime. Originally arrested under the orders of the king, after these edits, Tartuffe was instead arrested under a vague embodiment of the law. Making a change like this drastically changed the meaning and legitimacy of the scene. During the Old Regime, King Louis XIV had the arbitrary power to arrest people based on mere malicious intent, but the new revolutionary government that sought to establish law and order couldn’t as convincingly make such charges. Thus, by attempting to extract the play from the influence of the context in which it was created, revolutionaries had instead created an arguably illegitimate ending. Through my project I intend to analyze the historical contexts of these two time periods to draw conclusions about the legality of the ending of Tartuffe and whether or not it is important to the audience that legal legitimacy is accurately mimicked in art.