For questions, please contact Prof. Sylvain Chassang- chassang@nyu.edu
Abstract:
If Anne knows more than Bob about the state of the world, she may or may not know what Bob thinks, but it is always possible that she does. In other words, if the distribution of Anne’s first-order belief is a mean-preserving spread of the distribution of Bob’s first-order belief, we can construct signals for Anne and Bob that induce these distributions of beliefs and provide Anne with full information about Bob’s belief. We establish that with more agents, the analogous result does not hold. It might be that Anne knows more than Bob and Charles, who in turn both know more than David, yet what they know about the state precludes the possibility that Anne knows what Bob and Charles think and that everyone knows what David thinks. More generally, we define an information hierarchy as a partially ordered set and ask whether higher elements having more information about the state always makes the hierarchy compatible with higher elements knowing the beliefs of lower elements. We show that the answer is affirmative if and only if the graph of the hierarchy is a forest. We discuss applications of this result to rationalizing a decision maker’s reaction to unknown sources of information and to information design in hierarchical vs. non-hierarchical organizations.