Each year, the Program in Poetics and Theory organizes a schedule of events, including lectures, seminars, and conferences. While participation in some seminars is limited, most Poetics and Theory events are open to the public.
* * *
Each year, the Program in Poetics and Theory organizes a schedule of events, including lectures, seminars, and conferences. While participation in some seminars is limited, most Poetics and Theory events are open to the public.
* * *
2021
Professor Mark Christian Thompson will be presenting from his new book, Phenomenal Blackness, an unorthodox account of 1960s Black thought that rigorously details the field’s debts to German critical theory and explores a forgotten tradition of Black singularity.
Prior to the 1960s, sociologically oriented thinkers such as W. E. B. Du Bois had understood Blackness as a singular set of socio-historical characteristics. In contrast, writers such as Amiri Baraka, James Baldwin, Angela Y. Davis, Eldridge Cleaver, and Malcolm X were drawn to notions of an African essence, an ontology of Black being. With these perspectives, literary language came to be seen as the primary social expression of Blackness. For this new way of thinking, the works of philosophers such as Adorno, Habermas, and Marcuse were a vital resource, allowing for continued cultural-materialist analysis while accommodating the hermeneutical aspects of Black religious thought. Thompson argues that these efforts to reimagine Black singularity led to a phenomenological understanding of Blackness—a “Black aesthetic dimension” wherein aspirational models for Black liberation might emerge.
A butterfly is like another butterfly. A butterfly is also like a leaf and at the same time like a paper airplane, an owl’s face, a scholar flying from book to book. The most disparate things approach one another in a butterfly, the sort of dense nodule of likeness that Roger Caillois once proposed calling a “bizarre-privileged item.” In response, critical theorist Paul North proposes a spiritual exercise: imagine a universe made up solely of likenesses. There are no things, only traits acting according to the law of series, here and there a thick overlap that appears “bizarre.”
Centuries of thought have fixated on the concept of difference. This book offers a theory that begins from likeness, where, at any instant, a vast array of series proliferates and remote regions come into contact. Bizarre-Privileged Items in the Universe follows likenesses as they traverse physics and the physical universe; evolution and evolutionary theory; psychology and the psyche; sociality, language, and art. Divergent sources from an eccentric history help give shape to a new trans-science, “homeotics.”
Click HERE for more info!
In this talk Daniel Heller-Roazen will discuss his new book, Absentees: On Variously Missing Persons (Zone Books, 2021). From literature to legal codes and religious rites, missing, diminished and uncounted persons play complex yet also constant roles. These roles will be the focus of the talk, which, departing from a few exemplary cases, will probe the status of “nonpersons,” grasped as persons who, in diverse ways, fail to be, demanding of our attention.
Terrorism is a cancer, an infection, an epidemic, a plague. For more than a century, this metaphor has figured insurgent violence as contagion in order to contain its political energies. In Epidemic Empire, Anjuli Fatima Raza Kolb shows that this trope began in responses to the Indian Mutiny of 1857 and tracks its tenacious hold through 9/11 and beyond. The result is the first book-length study to approach the global War on Terror from a postcolonial literary perspective.
Raza Kolb assembles a diverse archive from colonial India, imperial Britain, French and independent Algeria, the postcolonial Islamic diaspora, and the neoimperial United States. Anchoring her book are studies of four major writers in the colonial-postcolonial canon: Rudyard Kipling, Bram Stoker, Albert Camus, and Salman Rushdie. Across these sources, she reveals the tendency to imagine anticolonial rebellion, and Muslim insurgency specifically, as a virulent form of social contagion. Exposing the long history of this broken but persistent narrative, Epidemic Empire is a major contribution to the rhetorical history of our present moment.
2020
In a span of about twenty years, starting at the turn of the twentieth century, the haiku went from being barely known outside of Japan to what could fairly be called a world literary form. In addition to the widespread translation (often retranslation) of Japanese haiku, there also arose an original literary production in English, French, Spanish, Italian, and other languages. This included not only the bits of lyric exoticism one might expect, but also works that engaged with many of the central issues of modernist poetics and indeed modernity more broadly. Specifically, the history of the modernist haiku foregrounds and elaborates tensions between conceptions of poetry as an increasingly concise, anti-discursive showing or shock, on the one hand, and the reinscription of those fleeting moments into complex and sustained projects of personal, national, and historical memory.
My talk will focus on three key moments in the modernist haiku tradition: the earliest French-language collection, Au fil de l’eau (1905); haiku written about the experience of trench warfare during the First World War and its connections to the avant-garde (most notably Julian Vocance’s Cent visions de guerre (1916)); and the Mexican haiku movement of the 1920s, including its reception in Europe. My conclusion turns to Shiki’s reinvention of the haiku form in order to consider how a more comparative history of the modernist haiku might help us interrogate not only the world but also the literature of “world literature.”
2019
This lecture aims to trace, to comprehend, to analyse, in order to question, the philosophical trajectory deployed by Heidegger that sustains a certain and profound correlation between the “history” (Geschichte) of the truth of Being and the “self-annihilation” (Selbstvernichtung) of Judaism. What occurs between the history of the truth of Being and the “self-annihilation” of Judaism? In which manner do these two motifs come to mutually weave each other and what effects does this relation have? According to which Law does this correlation engage, animate and affirm itself? Why and how does the “dispositive” proper to the truth of Being deploy – through the appropriation of its history and through the Germanic reappropriation of its “initiality” beyond its Greek “beginning” – the “self-annihilation” of Judaism? Following the publication of theBlack Notebooks (Schwarze Hefte), all readings or interpretations, analysis or examination of Heidegger’s philosophy must confront these questions and therefore question without complacency, with the utmost rigor, the meaning, the effects and the causes, of this intricate relation. We must question Heidegger’s philosophy not only in order to see the “place” towards which this thought engages us, but also in order to understand why and how an entire line of the history of philosophy has also engendered a resolute antijudaism. How and why has the history of Being, in deploying the very essence of its truth, also constituted and produced an antijudaism culminating in a definite antisemitism, one without precedent in the entire history of philosophy?
Kay Kâvus, the second Kayanid ruler in Ferdowsi’s Book of Kings, was not the wisest monarch in the dynasty. The 11th century Persian epic reports that the sovereign, driven by hubris and vainglory, set out to conquer Mâzandarân, the land of the demons, where none of his forefathers had dared to venture. The outcome is well known: after a shameful defeat at the hands of the fiends, the Iranian king and his champions are blinded and taken prisoner. Were it not for Rostam, the great hero come to their rescue, the empire would have collapsed and the radiant aura of Iranian kings forever dimmed. At the center of this critical episode lies the performance of a lyric poem that spurred the king’s thirst for conquest. How can a ruler risk his kingdom for a song? Does the destiny of an empire rest in the artful spinning of words and rhymes? Medieval Iranian philosophers did not consider these questions unworthy of their attention. Drawing on the Avicennan legacy, such authors as Nasir al-Din Tusi (13thc.) sought to account for the powers of poetry in terms of logic and natural science. Their teachings may shed some light on this momentous episode in the Shâhnâmeh, and on the far-reaching consequence of one demonic song.
Click HERE for more info!
Click HERE for more info!
Please join the NYU Society for Ancient Studies and the NYU Advanced Certficate Program in Poetics and Theory on Thursday, March 14 at 12:30 pm NYU Classics Department Seminar Room (Silver Center 503). Prof. Victoria Rimell, a distinguished name in classical studies at the University of Warwick, will be speaking on intimacies in Ovid.
Click HERE for more info!
A discussion of Stéphane Mallarmé’s enigmatic, unfinished text known as Le Livre. Sylvia Gorelick will read from her translation of The Book, which was published this past fall. Mary Ann Caws will speak about the text, translation, and Mallarmé’s poetics. A rich conversation will ensue.
Click HERE for more info!
Throughout her work, Catherine Malabou has developed the concept of plasticity to identify an irreducible potential for transformation inherent to form as such. Polemically, she has also insisted that this understanding of plasticity allows a model of drastic change free from any reference to transcendent exteriority, thereby recasting strong discontinuity as processually immanent. This talk considers what Malabou’s model might offer to neomaterialist and posthuman conceptions of agency. If such conceptions decouple agency from human-exceptionalist fantasies of ontological transcendence, primarily by severing its link to conscious intention, they also feel themselves obliged on these grounds to sacrifice any account of agency as decisive, prescriptive, or imperative – and so render themselves incapable of thinking specifically political agency in anything other than bland, retrospectively descriptive terms. If Malabou’s plasticity models strong discontinuity as processually immanent, does it by contrast allow an account of agency as both freed from transcendence and decisively oriented toward the future? And if so, does this in turn open the way to an understanding of political agency in which ontological equality could coexist with decisive intervention?
2018
Timing Blanchot
This symposium focuses on Blanchot’s writing from the thirties to the sixties and beyond, offering an occasion to reconsider not only his often-contested political trajectory from the non-conformist extreme right to the radical left, but also the evolving concerns of his literary and critical works.
2017
Passion for Ignorance presented by Renata Saleci
February, 28th, 2017, 19 University Place, The Great Room
In today’s times, anxiety, depression and various forms of self-harm are on the rise. The surprising counterpart to the idea of progress and the increase of information, however, is people’s ability to turn a blind eye when faced with traumatic personal and social situations. Some psychoanalysts have already decades ago argued that people paradoxically do not have passion for knowledge, but rather passion for ignorance.
The lecture will explore the nature of this passion in times when we are facing political crisis, ecological catastrophes as well as changes in the way people are brought up, how they become social beings and how they internalize or not social prohibitions. It will also look at how science (genetics and neuroscience) contributes to the feeling of anxiety and how it opens new avenues of ignorance.
2015-16
Biophilology: Walter Benjamin’s Literary Critical Project presented by Kevin McLaughlin
December 8, 2016, Room 222, 19 University Place
Le sans de l’être: Some Items from Derrida’s Work Seminar
April 18, 2016 — 2:00-4:45PM
The Great Room, 19 University Place
This seminar, led by Werner Hamacher (Frankfurt a. M.), will focus on the segment of Jacques Derrida’s Glas concerning simili-transcendentals, while also making reference to related arguments in “La différance” (Marges de la philosophie), “+R” (La vérité en peinture), “Geschlecht: différence sexuelle, différence ontologique,” and “Nombre de oui” (Psyché).
Lucretius and Modernity
Great New Books in the Humanities
February 25, 2016 — 6:00PM
20 Cooper Square, 5th Floor
An event celebrating the publication of Lucretius and Modernity: Epicurean Encounters Across Time and Disciplines (Palgrave MacMillan, 2016), the fruit of the 2011 Ranieri Colloquium in Ancient Studies at NYU. In view of the renewed visibility today of Lucretius’ De rerum natura, the volume, edited by Jacques Lezra, director of the Program in Poetics and Theory, and program alumnus Liza Blake (University of Toronto), brings together essays by distinguished scholars that together present a nuanced, skeptical, passionate, historically sensitive, and complicated account of what is at stake when Lucretius is claimed for modernity. Participating in the discussion alongside Lezra and Blake will be Brooke Holmes (Princeton University), David Konstan (NYU), and Matthew S. Santirocco (NYU). This event is cosponsored by the NYU Center for Ancient Studies, the Department of Comparative Literature, and the Program in Poetics and Theory. Additional support has generously been provided by the NYU Center for the Humanities.
Poetics & Theory 2015 Conference
In 1969, Louis Althusser advanced the thesis that, in the analysis of a given mode of production, it is the relations of production that, “on the basis of existing productive forces and within the limits they set, […] play the determinant role.” Because, however, “a mode of production subsists only insofar as the reproduction of the conditions of production is ensured,” it is more specifically “the reproduction of the relations of production” that, in the maintenance of a given mode of production, “plays the determinant role.” Consequently, “in order to understand the facts of the class struggle,” he wrote, it is necessary “to adopt ‘the standpoint of reproduction.’ “
Althusser’s thesis, formulated in response to a specific historical conjuncture, was no doubt also meant to inaugurate an extensive revision of the basic coordinates of Marxist (or Marxist-Leninist) philosophy: a revision that, under the heading of the “standpoint of reproduction,” would have implications for the analysis, not only of economic production, but also of discursive, or theoretical, production—in other words, for the analysis not only of relations of production but of the conceptual relations constitutive of theoretical discourse as well.
What, we ask, is “reproduction”? What is it today, that is, nearly fifty years after Althusser’s tight provocation? The mediations to which the concept has been subjected are numerous, and of extraordinary importance: “reproduction” changes with the dramatic shifts in technology of the past decades; with the prevalence of finance capitalism; with the consolidation of women’s rights and redefinitions of the “family” in other than heteronormative terms due to queer and feminist theoretical interventions; with shifts in the technologies of assisted reproduction, and with the configuration of the scene of biological reproduction according to economistic, non-, and anti-economistic paradigms. To speak of reproduction, and a fortiori to seek to adopt its “standpoint,” requires both an interrogation of the relations governing the reproduction of material bodies as well as an investigation of the relationship between “social,” “technical” and “natural” modes of reproduction. What are the mechanisms, social, technical, organic, ideological, mediating the reproduction of material bodies (with regard both to labor-power and to affective labor)? And in what way do they shape the said relationship between “social” and “natural” modes of reproduction?
But the matter of reproduction also raises questions of a more general, philosophical scope. Reproduction, according to Althusser, is a necessary function of social formations and at the same time that which has, not only to ensure, but in the first place to make possible, their existence. Its function and its effect are, in a sense, one and the same—or, to adopt the Althusserian idiom, the function of reproduction is, always already, an effect of its effect. To give precedence to reproduction in the analysis of—“material” as well as “discursive”—production in effect raises decisive questions related to the specific mode of causation and the particular temporality that its primacy would imply. In turn, such questions, “abstract” though they may be, presumably would have altogether concrete implications for historical and sociopolitical analysis. In that vein, it might be asked, for instance, in what ways and to what extent might the analysis of reproduction in its specific manifestations—in, for example, ethical, aesthetic, biopolitical, or juridical practices—contribute to the conceptualization of “the standpoint of reproduction” as a theoretical paradigm? And, more broadly, to what extent, or under what specific circumstances, might the dynamics of reproduction, whether in crisis or in stasis, entail not only the replication of the same but also the production of new and different relations?
Schedule
9:30-10:00
Introduction and Opening Remarks*
10:00-12:30
The Articulation of Ideology and the Unconscious in Althusser
Vittorio Morfino, University of Milan-Bicocca
Reproduction and the Abstract Real
Charles Gelman, New York University
On the Reproduction of the Organism
Emanuela Bianchi, New York University
2:30-4:00
From the “Reproduction of the Same” to “New Forms/Figures of the Thinkable”:
Reflections on Contemporary Critical Materialist Thought
Linda M. G. Zerilli, University of Chicago
Two Times of Capital, Logical and Historical
Siarhei Biareishyk, New York University
4:15-5:45
The Value Forms of Capitalist Reproduction
Gopal Balakrishnan, UC Santa Cruz
Reproduction by the Numbers (or, How to Count on Stalin’s Fingers)
Jacques Lezra, New York University
6:00-7:00 P.M.
Scattered Remarks on the History of “Reproduction”
Étienne Balibar, Columbia University
*coffee and a light breakfast will be provided
Participants
Gopal Balakrishnan is Professor in the History of Consciousness Department at UC Santa Cruz. A regular contributor to the New Left Review, Balakrishnan is also the author of The Enemy: An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt (Verso, 2000) and Antagonistics: Capitalism and Power in an Age of War (Verso, 2009), in addition to which he has edited two volumes, Debating Empire (Verso, 2003) and, with Benedict Anderson, Mapping the Nation (Verso, 1995). Currently, he is completing a two-volume study on the writings of Marx from his dissertation to Capital.
Étienne Balibar is Professor Emeritus of Moral and Political Philosophy at the Université de Paris X – Nanterre, Distinguished Professor of Humanities at UC Irvine, and currently Visiting Professor in the Department of French and Romance Philology at Columbia University. Among his many publications are Lire le Capital (with Louis Althusser et al.; P.U.F., 1965), Cinq études du matérialisme historique (Maspero, 1974), Spinoza et la politique (P.U.F., 1984), Race, Nation, Classe (with Immanuel Wallerstein; La Découverte, 1988), and, most recently, Citoyen sujet et autres essaies d’anthropologie philosophique (P.U.F., 2011) and Saeculum: Culture, religion, idéologie (Galilée, 2012).
Emanuela Bianchi is Assistant Professor of Comparative Literature at New York University. In addition to numerous articles, which have appeared in journals such as Epochê, Hypatia, and Continental Philosophy Review, Bianchi is the author of The Feminine Symptom: Aleatory Matter in the Aristotelian Cosmos (Fordham University Press, 2014) and the editor of Is Feminist Philosophy Philosophy?(Northwestern University Press, 1999).
Siarhei Biareishyk is a doctoral candidate in the Comparative Literature Department, New York University. Working in the materialist tradition of Lucretius, Spinoza, and Marx, his dissertation Missed Encounters: Spinoza, Political Romanticism, Soviet Formalismarticulates the politics of German Romanticism (e.g., Novalis, Kleist) and Russian Formalism (e.g., Tynyanov, Shklovsky), on the one hand, and seeks to develop the aesthetics of materialism, on the other. Biareishyk has published on Hegel-Kojève and Stalinism; psychoanalysis and the avant-garde; and Spinoza’s politics.
Charles Gelman is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Comparative Literature, New York University. His dissertation, provisionally titled Materialism and the Inassimilable Experience of Modernity: Walter Benjamin and Charles Baudelaire (in progress), is intended to be the first comprehensive historical and theoretical study of Benjamin’s writings on Baudelaire. His translation (with an introduction) of Jacques Derrida’s “Admiration de Nelson Mandela, ou Les lois de la réflexion” appeared in Law & Literature, vol. xxvi, no. 1 (Spring 2014).
Jacques Lezra is Professor of Comparative Literature and Spanish at New York University. The author of Unspeakable Subjects: The Genealogy of the Event in Early Modern Europe (Stanford University Press, 1997), Wild Materialism: The Ethic of Terror and the Modern Republic (Fordham University Press, 2010), and Contra los fueros de la muerte: El suceso cervantino (Polifemo, 2015), he is currently completing a fourth book, On the Nature of Marx’s Things. In addition, Lezra has published articles on Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure, contemporary and early modern translation theories and practices, Freud, Althusser, and Woolf, among other subjects. He is the co-translator of the Spanish edition of Paul de Man’s Blindness and Insight and, with Emily Apter and Michael Wood, co-editor of the Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon, the English translation of the Vocabulaire européen des philosophies (Barbara Cassin, ed.; Seuil, 2004).
Vittorio Morfino is Senior Researcher in the History of Philosophy at the Università di Milano-Bicocca. He is the author of numerous books, including Il Tempo e l’occasione (LED Edizioni Universitarie, 2002), Incursioni spinoziste: Causa, tempo, relazione (Mimesis, 2002),Spinoza e il non contemporaneo (Ombre Corte, 2009), Il tempo della moltitudine: Materialismo e politica prima e dopo Spinoza(Manifestolibri, 2005), and, most recently, Plural Temporalities: Transindividuality and the Aleatory between Spinoza and Althusser(Haymarket, 2015).
Linda M. G. Zerilli is the Charles E. Merriam Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, where she is also Faculty Director of the Center for the Study of Gender and Sexuality. Zerilli is the author of Signifying Woman (Cornell University Press, 1994), Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom (University of Chicago Press, 2005), A Democratic Theory of Judgment(University of Chicago Press, 2016), and articles on subjects ranging across feminist thought, the politics of language, aesthetics, democratic theory, and continental philosophy.
BRIEF: short stories today
Pierre Alferi
December 7, 2015 — 6:00PM
The Taub Center, 14A Washington Mews
To address the contemporary vogue of “flash fiction,” “smoke-long stories,” and “twitterature,” Pierre Alferi will propose a brief genealogy of the rhetorical and literary virtue of brevitas, pausing in particular over the anarchist moment (1892-1914), when the three-line story was invented by Félix Fénéon and there emerged a new consciousness of historical change.
Alferi argues that it was around that time that literary narrative first endeavored to embrace events of a more chaotic, unpredictable, and elusive nature, consisting in sudden subjective shifts of traumas that defy both causality and finality. Mallarmé, for one, strongly stated that such events stand beyond the reach of journalism (reportage) and that they call for new forms of narrative. Of such forms, twentieth-century short and very short stories offer an array of examples.
Following the lecture, Alferi will be joined in discussion by Avital Ronell (Professor of German and Comparative Literature, University Professor of Humanities, NYU).
Pierre Alferi is among the most innovative and critically acclaimed poets writing today. The author of over a dozen works of poetry, beginning with Les allures naturelles (P.O.L., 1991), and five works of fiction, including, most recently, Kiwi : roman-feuilleton (P.O.L., 2012), Alferi is also a visual artist, an esteemed teacher, and the translator of works by poets from John Donne to Louis Zukofsky, scholars such as Giorgio Agamben and Meyer Schapiro, and biblical texts.
Husserl and Shklovsky on Aesthetic Experience
Anna Yampolskaya
November 30, 2015 — 6:30PM
The Jordan Center, 19 University Place
In a letter to Hugo von Hofmannsthal Husserl claims that aesthetic and phenomenological experiences are similar. The work of art “forces us into” the aesthetic attitude in the same way as the ἐποχή of phenomenological method drives us into the phenomenological one. Prof. Yampolskaya will investigate this parallel between aesthetic experience and the practice of phenomenology using Viktor Shklovsky’s theory of “estrangement.” Like “estrangement,” phenomenological reduction can also be described as a philosophical technique that aims to arrest “pre-given” meaning in order to access to a new, not yet stabilized meaning. It is not enough to turn from what appears to how it appears; one has to oscillate between these conflicting positions, or rather to maintain them both at the same time. This double life in two different attitudes will be elucidated in terms of Roman Jakobson’s theory of the antinomic coexistence of the poetic and the practical functions of language.
Anna Yampolskaya is Professor at the Centre for Phenomenological Philosophy, Dept. of Philosophy, Russian State University for the Humanities, and Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for Fundamental Sociology, National Research University Higher School of Economics. She is the author of Emmanuel Levinas: philosophy and biography (Дух i Лiтера, 2011) and Phenomenology in France and Germany: the problem of method (РГГУ, 2013).
The Standpoint of Reproduction:
Questions for Contemporary Materialist Thought
conference
November 20, 2015
Jurow Hall, Silver Center for Arts & Science
A conference organized by the Program in Poetics and Theory. Additional support provided by the Dept. of English. Presenters: Cinzia Arruzza (NSSR), Gopal Balakrishnan (UC Santa Cruz), Étienne Balibar (Université de Paris X – Nanterre and Columbia University), Emanuela Bianchi (NYU), Siarhei Biareishyk (NYU), Charles Gelman (NYU), Jacques Lezra (NYU), Vittorio Morfino (University of Milan-Bicocca), and Linda M. G. Zerilli (University of Chicago).
For further information, visit the conference webpage.
Another World is Virtual
Homay King and Giuseppe Bianco
November 5, 2015 — 6:00PM
The Jordan Center, 19 University Place
A discussion of Homay King’s Virtual Memory: Time-Based Art and the Dream of Digitality.
Homay King is Associate Professor of the History of Art, Director of the Program in Film Studies, and Director of the Center for Visual Culture at Bryn Mawr College. Her fields of research include American cinema, film theory, psychoanalytic theory, and feminist film theory and criticism. King’s essays on contemporary art, film, photography, and theory have appeared in the journals Afterall, Camera Obscura, Discourse, Film Quarterly, OCTOBER, and Qui Parle, and in the edited collections Jeff Wall: Photographs, Stanley Kubrick: Essays on His Films and Legacy, and There She Goes: Feminist Filmmaking and Beyond. She is also the author of two books, Lost in Translation: Orientalism, Projection, and the Enigmatic Signifier (Duke University Press, 2010) and, most recently, Virtual Memory: Time-Based Art and the Dream of Digitality (Duke University Press, 2015).
Giuseppe Bianco is a fellow at the Institut d’Études Avancées de Paris and currently a visiting fellow at the Remarque Institute. His research bears on the history of the relationship between social and life sciences in nineteenth- and twentieth-century Europe, on the one hand, and the impact of social sciences in the research on the history of ideas, on the other. He is currently working on a book about Georges Canguilhem and the consolidation of the philosophical field during the Fourth Republic. He is the author of Après Bergson (Presses Universitaires de France, 2015), La signification du concret. Psychologie et philosophie chez Georges Politzer (Hermann, 2015), and The Care of Life (Rowman, 2014), and the editor of Jean Hyppolite entre structure et existence (Rue d’Ulm, 2013) and Badiou and the Philosophers (Bloomsbury, 2013).
2014-15
On Fear(s)
Anne Dufourmantelle, in conversation with Avital Ronell
March 10, 2015 — 12:00PM
19 University Place, Rm. 222
This lecture will consider the phenomenon of fear from a philosophical as well as from a psychoanalytic point of view and will go on to analyze our society’s dependence on fear as a motivation—a fear often fostered in the name of an alleged need for “security.” The lecture will be followed by a discussion with Avital Ronell.
Anne Dufourmantelle holds a doctorate in philosophy from the Université Paris-Sorbonne (Paris IV) and teaches both philosophy and the history of psychoanalysis at the European Graduate School in Saas-Fee, Switzerland. A practicing psychoanalyst, she is also the author of seven books in the fields of psychoanalysis and philosophy, as well as, with Jacques Derrida, De l’hospitalité (Calmann-Lévy, 1997); with Antonio Negri, Du retour: Abécédaire biopolitique (Calmann-Lévy, 2002); and, with Avital Ronell, Fighting Theory (University of Illinois Press, 2010). Her latest book, Puissance de la douceur (Payot, 2013), will be published in English translation by Fordham University Press in Fall 2015.
Avital Ronell is University Professor of Humanities and Chair of Comparative Literature at NYU and currently Director of the Program in Poetics & Theory. She is the author of numerous books and essays, including, most recently, Loser Sons: Politics and Authority (University of Illinois Press, 2012) and The Test Drive (University of Illinois Press, 2007).
Politics of Divination:
Neoliberal Endgame and the Religion of Contingency
Joshua Ramey, with a response by Dimitris Vardoulakis
November 20, 2014 — 6:30PM
The Great Room, 19 University Place
Since the 2008 financial crisis, the neoliberal ideas that arguably caused the damage have been triumphant in presenting themselves as the only possible solution for it. How can we account for the persistence of neoliberal hegemony, in spite of its obviously disastrous effects upon labor, capital, ecology, and society? The argument pursued in Professor Ramey’s forthcoming book, Politics of Divination: Neoliberal Endgame and the Religion of Contingency, is that part of the persistence of neoliberalism has to do with the archaic and obscure political theology—a political theology of chance that both underwrites and obscures sacrificial devotion to market outcomes—upon which of much of its discourse trades. That political theology is structured around hidden homologies between modern markets, as non-rational randomizing “meta-information processors,” and archaic divination tools, which are used in public acts of tradition-bound attempts to interpret the deliverances of chance. Only by recognizing the persistently sacred character of chance within putatively secularized discourses of risk and randomness can the investments of neoliberal power be exposed at their sacred source, and an alternative political theology be constructed.
Joshua Ramey is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Grinnell College. His research is in contemporary continental philosophy, critical social theory, political economy and political theology. He is the author of The Hermetic Deleuze: Philosophy and Spiritual Ordeal (Duke University Press, 2012) and co-translator of François Laruelle’s Non-Philosophical Mysticism for Today (Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming), and the author of a number of articles on figures including Adorno, Žižek, and Badiou.
Dimitris Vardoulakis is Associate Professor of Philosophy and Chair of the Philosophy Research Group at the University of Western Sydney. His research interests range from the relation between literature and philosophy to theories of power and sovereignty. His books include The Doppelgänger: Literature’s Philosophy (Fordham University Press, 2010), Sovereignty and Its Other: Toward the Dejustification of Violence (Fordham University Press, 2013), and, as editor, Spinoza Now (University of Minnesota Press, 2011) and (with Andrew Benjamin) “Sparks will fly”: Benjamin and Heidegger (SUNY Press, 2014).
2013-14
How Does Michael K Resist Sovereign Power?
Dimitris Vardoulakis
November 13, 2013 — 6:30PM
19 University Place, Rm. 222
J.M. Coetzee’s character Michael K, from the novella Life & Times of Michael K, is modeled on the eponymous protagonist of Heinrich von Kleist’s Michael Kohlhaas. But whereas Kohlhaas confronts sovereign power head-on, raising his voice to assert his point of view and taking up arms against the local junker, Michael K is hardly articulate and seems only to evade power. Nevertheless, Coetzee’s reliance on Kleist’s hero raises the question as to whether, and how, we can understand Michael K’s actions as a radical opposition to constituted power. Professor Vardoulakis will argue that it is only possible to answer this question by considering what kind of power Michael K is confronting. Whom does Michael K oppose?
Dimitris Vardoulakis is Associate Professor of Philosophy and Chair of the Philosophy Research Group at the University of Western Sydney. His research interests range from the relation between literature and philosophy to theories of power and sovereignty. His books include The Doppelgänger: Literature’s Philosophy (Fordham University Press, 2010), Sovereignty and Its Other: Toward the Dejustification of Violence (Fordham University Press, 2013), and, as editor, Spinoza Now (University of Minnesota Press, 2011) and (with Andrew Benjamin) “Sparks will fly”: Benjamin and Heidegger (SUNY Press, 2014).
On the Four Generations of Derrida’s “Geschlecht”
David Farrell Krell
November 7, 2013 — 5:00PM
The Great Room, 19 University Place
This lecture focuses on the third—never completed and never published—of Derrida’s “Geschlecht” papers and is based on Derrida’s notes from his 1984-85 seminar, “The Phantom of the Other.”
David Farrell Krell is Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at DePaul University and currently Brauer Distinguished Visiting Professor of German Studies at Brown University. He is the author of numerous volumes, including, most recently, Derrida and Our Animal Others: Derrida’s Final Seminar, The Beast and the Sovereign(Indiana University Press, 2013) and The Tragic Absolute: German Idealism and the Languishing of God (Indiana University Press, 2005), and the translator and editor of Martin Heidegger’s Basic Writings (HarperCollins, 1993/2008) and Nietzsche(HarperCollins, 1991).
2012-13
Ethopoiea: On the Critical Potential of Passionate Character
Lynn Enterline
April 18, 2013 — 4:00PM
The Great Room, 19 University Place
A lecture on two Elizabethan minor epics (by, respectively, Thomas Lodge and Christopher Marlowe) and Shakespeare’s Othello.
Lynn Enterline is the Nancy Perot Mulford Professor of English at Vanderbilt University. Her research into early modern literature and culture investigates the connections among the histories of sexuality, rhetoric, and emotion in the English, Latin, Greek, and Italian traditions. She is the author of Shakespeare’s Schoolroom: Rhetoric, Discipline, Emotion (University of Pennsylvania Press 2012), The Rhetoric of the Body from Ovid to Shakespeare (Cambridge University Press, 2000), and The Tears of Narcissus: Melancholia and Masculinity in Early Modern Writing (Stanford University Press, 1995).
Wild Materialism and Forms of Life Seminar
March 26, 2013 — 2:00-6:00PM
The Great Room, 19 University Place
A seminar with Andrea Allerkamp (Europa-Universität Viadrina) and Jacques Lezra (NYU). Presentations: Sebastian Edinger and Tim Sparenberg. Readings: Lamarck, Philosophie zoologique (selections), and Herbert Spencer, “A Theory of Population, Deduced from the General Law of Animal Fertility,” and “The Development Hypothesis.”
Wild Materialism and Forms of Life Seminar
March 12, 2013 — 2:00-6:00PM
The Great Room, 19 University Place
A seminar with Andrea Allerkamp (Europa-Universität Viadrina) and Jacques Lezra (NYU). Presentations: Matthias Preuss and Patricia Gwozdz. Readings: Marx, “Fragment on Machines” and “The Fetishism of Commodities and the Secret thereof”; Louis Althusser, Philosophy and the Spontaneous Philosophy of the Scientists (pp. 119-144); and Jacques Monod, Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology (Preface) and “III Lectures.”
Aesthetics and Deconstruction Workshop
March 6, 2013 — 3:30-8:00PM
Silver Center for Arts and Science, Rm. 503A
A workshop with Andrea Allerkamp (Europa-Universität Viadrina), Jacques Lezra (NYU), and Stéphane Lojkine (Aix-Marseille Université). Presentations: Philipp Weber, Jakob Heller, and Max Haas. Readings: Kant, Critique of the Power of Judgment (I.i, §§1-2, 14, 26); Diderot, Salon de 1767 (Preface); Heidegger, “The Origin of the Work of Art”; and Derrida, The Truth in Painting (1.2, 1.4).
Aesthetics and Deconstruction Workshop
March 5, 2013 — 10:00AM-2:00PM
Draper Seminar Room, 14 University Place
A workshop with Andrea Allerkamp (Europa-Universität Viadrina), Jacques Lezra (NYU), and Stéphane Lojkine (Aix-Marseille Université). Presentations: Philipp Weber, Jakob Heller, and Max Haas. Readings: Kant, Critique of the Power of Judgment (I.i, §§1-2, 14, 26); Diderot, Salon de 1767 (Preface); Heidegger, “The Origin of the Work of Art”; and Derrida, The Truth in Painting (1.2, 1.4).
Wild Materialism and Forms of Life Seminar
February 26, 2013 — 2:00-6:00PM
The Great Room, 19 University Place
A seminar with Andrea Allerkamp (Europa-Universität Viadrina) and Jacques Lezra (NYU). Presentations: Sage Anderson and Elizabeth Bonapfel. Readings: Descartes, Meditationes (I-II), and Antonio Negri, Political Descartes: Reason, Ideology and the Bourgeois Project (Introduction and Ch. 1).
Speculative Worlds Workshop
November 9, 2012 — 11:00AM-4:00PM
The Great Room, 19 University Place
A workshop with Armen Avanessian and Anke Hennig of the Spekulative Poetik research group at the Freie Universität Berlin, Jacques Lezra (NYU), Suhail Malik (Goldsmiths College London and CCS Bard), Kevin McLaughlin (Brown University), and Paul North (Yale University), on the intersections, homologies, and contrasts among current tendencies in the philosophies of speculative materialism and of literature. Papers:
Poetic Force: Kant, Benjamin, Hölderlin……………………………………………….What Thinking Feels Like
Kevin McLaughlin, Brown University……………………………………………….Paul North, Yale University
Not Only a God Can Save Us Now:
Meillassoux’s Deconstruction of Rational Finitude and the Politics of Philosophy
Suhail Malik, Goldsmiths College London and CCS Bard
Speculative Philosophy Seminar
October 12, 2013 — 4:00-6:30PM
19 University Place, Rm. 222
A seminar with Armen Avanessian and Anke Hennig of the Spekulative Poetik research group at the Freie Universität Berlin. Readings: Hegel, The Phenomenology of Spirit (Preface), and Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality and Dialectic (Ch. 12).
“What do we do now, now that we are happy?”:
Kojève and Beckett on the End of History
Richard Halpern
October 9, 2013 — 6:30PM
19 University Place, Rm. 222
Richard Halpern is Professor of English and the Erich Maria Remarque Professor of Literature at NYU. He works in the areas of early modern literature, with a particular focus on drama and Shakespeare, modernism, and Greek drama. His current book project is a study of tragic drama and political economy from Aeschylus to Beckett. Among his earlier books are The Poetics of Primitive Accumulation: English Renaissance Culture and the Genealogy of Capital (Cornell University Press, 1991), Shakespeare among the Moderns (Cornell University Press, 1997), and Shakespeare’s Perfume: Sodomy and Sublimity in the Sonnets, Wilde, Freud and Lacan (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002).
Speculative Poetics Workshop
September 28, 2013 — 4:00-6:30PM
The Great Room, 19 University Place
A seminar with Armen Avanessian and Anke Hennig of the Spekulative Poetik research group at the Freie Universität Berlin. The seminar will be dedicated to an examination of the following theses: Literature is neither solely style nor sign; rather, it is knowledge of the world. Thus, poetics can be speculative when its philosophical reflections consider the poietic function of language. Language and literature are part of the world and contribute in turn to our understanding of it. The relationships between objects do not differ from those between cognitive subjects and their respective objects. Literary thought means, therefore, situating natural language, literary artifacts, and poetic thought on a single plane. Readings: Howard Caygill, Walter Benjamin: The Colour of Experience (Chs. 1-2), and Ten Theses on Speculative Poetics.
2011-12
Translation, Transference and Sublation in
The Merchant of Venice: Shakespeare-Hegel-Derrida
Katrin Trüstedt
April 2, 2012 — 6:00PM
Draper Seminar Room, 14 University Place
Katrin Trüstedt is Professor of Allgemeine und Vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft at the Universität Erfurt. She is the author of Die Komödie der Tragödie: Shakespeares Sturm am Umschlagplatz von Mythos und Moderne, Rache und Recht, Tragik und Spiel(Konstanz University Press, 2011), as well as numerous articles and essays in edited volumes and in journals such as Law and Humanities, Law and Literature, Telos, and the Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie. She is also the the co-editor, with Kathrin Thiele, of Happy Days: Lebenswissen nach Cavell (Fink Verlag, 2009).
Spinoza: Laying the Ground of Biopolitics Seminar
March 26, 2012 — 6:00-8:00PM
The Great Room, 19 University Place
A seminar with A. Kiarina Kordela (Macalaster College). This seminar will center on a discussion of Spinoza’s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus and of his conception of power, in particular, which already implies a shift from what Foucault calls “sovereign power” to “biopolitics”—i.e., from a form of power that threatens its subjects to one that protects them, and which, therefore, is not dependent on obedience but feeds, rather, on desire and on love. Unlike Foucault’s, however, Spinoza’s work indicates that biopolitics concerns the greatest good, not of the biological body, but of the body and mind insofar as they can be conceived sub specie aeternitatis. We will conclude with a discussion of what Spinoza’s conception of the body may entail for our understanding of the workings of biopolitics. Readings: Foucault, Society Must Be Defended (pp. 239-64), and Spinoza,Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (Preface and Chs. 4, 14-16, and 20) and Ethics (Bk. V).
Reification
Dirk Quadflieg
March 20, 2012 — 4:00PM
The Great Room, 19 University Place
Dirk Quadflieg teaches in the Institut für Philosophie at the Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main and is currently a visiting scholar in the Department of Philosophy, Columbia University. He is the author of Differenz und Raum: Zwischen Hegel, Wittgenstein und Derrida (Transcript Verlag, 2007) and the co-editor, with Andreas Hetzel and Heidi Salaverría, of Alterität und Anerkennung (Nomos, 2011).
Reification: Lukács and Honneth Seminar
March 19, 2012 — 6:30-8:30PM
19 University Place, Rm. 223
A seminar with Dirk Quadflieg (Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main and Columbia University). Readings: Georg Lukács, “Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat” (Pt. 1), and Axel Honneth, Reification: A Recognition-Theoretical View.
Flirtations: Aesthetics and Rhetoric This Side of Seduction Workshop
March 3, 2012 — 10:30AM-5:00PM
The Great Room, 19 University Place
A workshop with Rüdiger Campe (Yale University), Paul Fleming (Cornell University), John Hamilton (Harvard University), Jacques Lezra (NYU), Elisabeth Strowick (Johns Hopkins University), and Barbara Vinken (LMU München and NYU). Organized by the Program in Poetics & Theory and the Dept. of Comparative Literature. Sponsored by the Humanities Initiative.
Anachronic Shakespeare Conference
February 24-25, 2012
Jurow Hall, Silver Center for Arts & Science
A conference organized by the Program in Poetics & Theory. Co-sponsored by the DFG Graduiertenkolleg Lebensformen und Lebenswissen and the Dept. of Comparative Literature. Presenters: John Archer (NYU), Rebecca Comay (University of Toronto), Stuart Elden (Durham University), Anselm Haverkamp (NYU), Julia Lupton (UC Irvine), Vike Plock (University of Exeter), and Samuel Weber (Northwestern University).
Lucretius and Modernity
Ranieri Colloquium in Ancient Studies
October 26-28, 2011
Hemmerdinger Hall, Silver Center for Arts & Science
A conference organized by the Center for Ancient Studies and the Dept. of Comparative Literature. Co-sponsored by the Gallatin School of Individualized Study, the Humanities Initiative, the Depts. of Philosophy, French, Classics and English, and the Program in Poetics & Theory.
The long shadow cast by Lucretius’s poem falls across the disciplines of philosophy, literary history and criticism, religious studies, classics, and political philosophy. Over the past two decades, interest in De rerum natura in each of these fields has grown dramatically, in some cases as hidden Epicurean influences on well-known writers have come to light, in others when the decline of a school or of a particular orthodoxy has left room for a return to Lucretius, and to the Epicurean tradition more broadly—as with the eclipse of normative materialisms in philosophy and politics. Contemporary physics has found in the ancient atomist tradition a strange and evocative mirror; the place of Lucretius’s poetics in the development of modern poetic genres, techniques, and themes has come into sharp focus; political philosophers have identified what Althusser called a “subterranean current” in the materialist tradition, flowing from Epicurus through Spinoza and Marx and to Deleuze, propelled by Lucretius’s great poem.
“Lucretius and Modernity” is the first conference to bring together classicists, philosophers and literary critics from Europe and the United States interested centrally in the work of Lucretius and in the long history of his reception. The papers presented at “Lucretius and Modernity” will provide the occasion for a reflection across disciplinary borders on the poem’s continuing, growing importance.
What Causes Space?
Graham Harman
September 9, 2011 — 6:30PM
19 University Place, Rm. 222
A lecture organized by the Program in Poetics & Theory and the BABEL Working Group.
Graham Harman is Professor of Philosophy at the American University in Cairo. He is the author of numerous books and articles, including The Quadruple Object (Zero Books, 2011), Towards Speculative Realism: Essays and Lectures (Zero Books, 2010), Guerrilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things (Open Court, 2005), and Tool-Being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects (Open Court, 2002).
2010-11
Shakespeare and Philosophy Conference
March 25-26, 2011
Deutsches Haus, 42 Washington Mews
The Great Room, 19 University Place
A conference organized by the Program in Poetics & Theory. Co-sponsored by the DFG Graduiertenkolleg Lebensformen und Lebenswissen, the Depts. of Comparative Literature and English, and the Callaway Fund in Drama. Presenters: Richard Halpern (Johns Hopkins University), Paul Kottman (NSSR), Philip Lorenz (Cornell University), Peter Saval (Brown University), David Schalkwyk (University of Cape Town), Annika Thiem (Villanova University), and Katrin Trüstedt (Universität Erfurt).
The Rhetoric of Terror Seminar
February 11, 2011 — 4:00-6:00PM
19 University Place, Rm. 222
A seminar with Marc Redfield (Brown University) on his book The Rhetoric of Terror: Reflections on 9/11 and the War on Terror(Fordham University Press, 2009).
Absolute and Particular Others: Reading Beauvoir with Cavell
Toril Moi
November 5, 2010 — 4:00PM
The Great Room, 19 University Place
Toril Moi is Professor of English, Philosophy, and Theater Studies, and the James B. Duke Professor of Literature and Romance Studies at Duke University. Her research centers on feminist theory and women’s writing, the intersection of literature, philosophy, and aesthetics, and ordinary language philosophy in the tradition of Wittgenstein, Cavell, and Austin. She is the author of numerous books, including Henrik Ibsen and the Birth of Modernism: Art, Theater, Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2006) and Simone de Beauvoir: The Making of an Intellectual Woman, now in its second edition (Oxford University Press, 2008).
The Philosophy of Marx
Étienne Balibar
October 13, 2010 — 6:00PM
The Great Room, 19 University Place
Étienne Balibar is Professor Emeritus of Moral and Political Philosophy at the Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense and Distinguished Professor of Humanities at the University of California, Irvine. One of the co-authors (alongside Louis Althusser, Roger Establet, Pierre Macherey, and Jacques Rancière) of Lire Le Capital (Maspero, 1965), which remains one of the most influential works of Marxist thought to have been published in the past century, he has since authored well over a dozen volumes, including Cinq études du matérialisme historique (Maspero, 1974), Spinoza et la politique (P.U.F., 1985), and La philosophie de Marx (La Découverte, 1993). His most recent book is La proposition de l’égaliberté (P.U.F., 2010).
2009-10
. . . for example Workshop
March 27, 2010 — 12:00-5:00PM
20 Cooper Square, 5th Floor
A workshop on exemplarity, with Paul Fleming (NYU), Michèle Lowrie (University of Chicago), Neni Panourgía (Columbia University), and Anthony Vidler (Cooper Union). Organized by the Program in Poetics & Theory. Co-sponsored by the Humanities Initiative.
On the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary
of Hegemony and Socialist Strategy
symposium
February 20, 2010 — 10:30AM-12:45PM
Hemmerdinger Hall, Silver Center for Arts & Science
A symposium celebrating the twenty-fifth anniversary of Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, with authors Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, and distinguished guests Seyla Benhabib (Yale University), Robin Blackburn (University of Essex/NSSR), Joan Copjec (SUNY Buffalo), Drucilla Cornell (Rutgers University/University of Cape Town), and Nancy Fraser (NSSR).
Negation, Negativity, Identity Colloquium
February 18, 2010 — 6:30PM
19 University Place, Rm. 102
A colloquium with Gabriela Basterra (NYU), Ernesto Laclau (University of Essex), and Jacques Lezra (NYU). Organized by the Department of Comparative Literature and the Program in Poetics & Theory. Papers:
Naming an Absent Cause………………………………………………..Marrano Discipline
Gabriela Basterra, NYU………………………………………………..Jacques Lezra, NYU
What Kind of Negativity Is Inherent in Social Antagonisms?
Ernesto Laclau, University of Sussex
“to believe in this world, as it is. . .”
The Difficult Quest of Immanence in Politics
Kathrin Thiele
November 17, 2009 — 6:30PM
Silver Center for Arts & Science, Rm. 220
Kathrin Thiele is Assistant Professor for Political Philosophy in the Department of Philosophy, Universität Potsdam, and Coordinator of the DFG Graduiertenkolleg Lebensformen und Lebenswissen. She is the author of The Thought of Becoming: Gilles Deleuze’s Poetics of Life (Diaphanes, 2008) and co-editor, with Kathrin Trüstedt, of Happy Days: Lebenswissen nach Cavell (Fink Verlag, 2009).